Green synthesis, Characterization and In vitro Biological Studies of Quercetin complexes with Zn (II) Acetate and N^N Moiety

 

Tanu Srivastava1*, S. K. Mishra2, O. P. Tiwari3, Kavindra Nath Tiwari4, Pradeep Kumar4, Jitendra Kumar2,

Amit Kumar Singh2, Angaraj Singh5, Ashutosh Dwivedi5

1Assistant Professor, SHEAT College of Pharmacy, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh - 221210, India.

2Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmaceutical, Engineering, and Technology,

Indian Institute of Technology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh - 221005, India.

3Director, Varanasi College of Pharmacy, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh - 221105, India.

4Professor, Department of Botany, MMV, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh - 221005, India.

5Assistant Professor, Department of Ceramic Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology,

Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh -221005, India.

*Corresponding Author E-mail: tanusrivns@gmail.com

 

ABSTRACT:

Green synthesis of two coordination complexes of zinc acetate with N^N moiety on quercetin, which is a flavonoid is carried out. The complexes were obtained in high yields (> 97%) by grinding methods without the involvement of any solvent. Neither catalyst nor any additives were needed to perform the reactions. It was characterized by FT-IR, UV-Vis, NMR, HRMS, and elemental analysis. Antioxidant activity was done through the DPPH method which was compared with ascorbic acid and ligand (Quercetin). The study reveals that Complex 1 (IC50 163.093µg/ml) has significant free radical scavenging activity as compared to complex 2 (IC50 258.683µg/ml). Biological activity was performed against microbes (E. coli and S. aureus). MIC value of complex 1 (15.50µg/ml E. coli, 7.18µg/ml S. aureus) was found more significant as compared to complex 2 (22.51µg/ml E. coli, 18.62µg/ml S. aureus) and quercetin.

 

KEYWORDS: Solid-state, Coordination complexes, DPPH, Minimum inhibitory concentration.

 

 


1. INTRODUCTION:

Mostly organic reactions are carried out in the presence of a solvent. The solvents which are used ultimately reduce the yield and also spread hazardous effects on the environment1. The solvents and catalysts used for the synthesis may be a good source of impurity in the compound. Solid-state synthesis does not require all these additives for the completion of the reaction of so-called green synthesis. Compared to the current conventional organic reaction green synthesis has manifold merits which include high reaction velocity, several steps reduction, cost-effective and green impact on environment2.

 

The green synthetic for novel drug discovery from the natural product has brought different applications3. The flavonoids are obtained from tea, red wine, olive oil, fruits, and seeds of the plant4. The flavonoids demonstrate a wide variety of biological activities such as anticancerous, anti-inflammatory, antiplatelet, antithrombotic, antioxidant, antibacterial, cytoprotective activities, etc.5-14. Quercetin, a flavone class of compounds has different coordination sites in its molecule that may be utilized for complex formation with transition metals. Quercetin has a wide application in health and diseases15. In this paper, we synthesized a complex with zinc acetate, 2, 2'-bipyridyl, 1, 10-phenanthroline, and quercetin. Metal chlorides (MCl2) with quercetin and N^N ligand have already been reported in the solvent phase16 but in this article, we have taken metal acetate (MAcO) coordinated with quercetin and N^N ligand in a solvent-free environment. In coordination, chemistry zinc is a sunshine central metal cation. In human zinc is the most abundant trace metal after iron and this is the only metal cation that is present in all enzyme categories. Zinc performs various physiological functions such as catalytic factor (as a cofactor in six main enzyme classes), as a structural component (zinc fingers), etc.17. Zinc (II) with quercetin and one of the aromatic observer ligand i.e. 2,2′-bipyridine show different biological activities In vitro18. The solvents are hazardous; many of them are reported for causing various lethal diseases. We focused on solid-state synthesis with the required ingredients, characterization, and further, the synthesized compounds were tested for antimicrobial and antioxidant activity.

 

2.    EXPERIMENTAL:

Materials:

The reagents, Quercetin dihydrate (Q), 2, 2’-bipyridine (Bpy), 1, 10- phenanthroline (Phen), and 2, 2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) were acquired from the Sigma Aldrich.

 

Measurements:

Characterization and structure elucidation of the synthesized compounds was done by Elemental analysis (Euro EA Elemental Analyzer), FT-IR spectra (Perkin Elmer Spectrum version 10.4.3 spectrometer as KBr pellet, within the range of 400-4000 cm-1), UV- visible spectra (UV-1800 Shimadzu ver. 2.52 spectrophotometer using 1 cm path-length quartz cuvettes, in the range of 200-700 nm). NMR study (Bruker Corporation, JNM- ECZ500R/S1), HRMS study (TOF MS, 100-1000). The antioxidant studies (DPPH method), MIC assay against E. coli and S.aureus bacteria were also performed. Here quercetin itself is taken as reference for comparison of the activity of complexes.

 

2.1 Synthesis of quercetin–zinc (ii) with 2,2'-bipyridal, and 1, 10-phenanthroline complex:

Complex 1 and 2 were synthesized by taking all the ingredients in the molar ratio of 1: 1: 1. Accurately weighed compounds were taken followed by trituration using a clean and dried mortar, pestle at room temperature. Complex 1 (reddish-orange) was synthesized with quercetin (1mmol), 1, 10-phenanthroline (1mmol), and Zn (II) metal ions (1mmol) by the solid-state trituration method using the mortal, pestle. Quercetin (1mmol), 2, 2'-bipyridal (1mmol), and Zn (II) metal ions (1mmol) in the solid-state was taken for complex 2 (reddish- yellow) syntheses by the same process. The change in color of the product shows that the reaction is completed and the product was characterized by different spectroscopic techniques.

 

Complex1. C29H21ZnN2O10 (621gmol-1): Yield: 93%, IR (KBr, cm-1): 3363.32 (ƲO-H), 1644.11(ƲC=O), 1416.64 (ƲC-OH), 1265.70 (ƲC-O-C), 1182.56 (ƲCC+ƲCCH), 759.35, 731.72 (ƲNCCH+ƲCCCH). Elemental analysis: Expt. (Calc.) C% 55.87(55.92), H% 3.84(3.40), O% 25.52(25.69), 1H NMR (500 MHz), δ/ppm (DMSO-d6): 6.0 – 6.3 (s, 4H, -OH), 7.918- 9.005(s, 8H, Bpy and s, 5H, -CH), 1.769 (s, 3H, -CH3), HRMS: m/z 624.9856 [(Q-H) + Zn (II) (Phen) (AcO) (H2O)].

 

Complex 2. C27H21ZnN2O10 (597gmol-1): Yield: 95%, IR (KBr, cm-1): 3131.39 (ƲO-H), 1646.43(ƲC=O), 1426.63 (ƲC-OH), 1264.14 (ƲC-O-C), 1168.25 (ƲCC+ƲCCH), 824, 724 (ƲNCCH+ƲCCCH). Elemental analysis: Expt. (Calc.) C% 54.00(54.15), H% 3.45(3.53), O% 26.48(26.72), 1H NMR (500 MHz), δ/ppm (DMSO-d6): 6.107-6.814 (s, 4H, -OH), 7.587- 8.731 (s, 8H, Phen and s, 5H, -CH), 1.809- 2.877 (s, 3H, -CH3), HRMS: m/z 599.0085 [(Q-H) + Zn (II) (BPY) (AcO) (H2O)].


 

Scheme1. Proposed scheme for complex 1 and complex 2 in the solvent-free phase


 

2.2 In vitro antioxidant activity (DPPH method):

Antioxidant activity of the compounds (Complex 1, 2) was checked by an earlier reported method of Brand Williams et.al with slight modification19. Different concentrations of complex 1, 2 (30µL) were taken with 3ml of DPPH (0.004% of methanolic solution) followed by stirring. The mixture was incubated for a quarter-hour at room temperature. The absorbance of the incubated mixture was taken at 517nm using spectrophotometer and results are expressed as inhibition percentage of free radical by the compounds.

 

[DPPH free radical scavenging activity (%) =

Ao-At/Ao× 100]

 

Where Ao = absorbance of the control and At= absorbance of the test /standard sample

 

 2.3 In vitro antibacterial activity:

Antibacterial activity of Complex 1 and complex 2 was tested in-vitro and MIC was determined by using the micro-dilution method20 against Gram-positive i.e. Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus, ATCC 29213) and gram-negative i.e. E.coli strains (ATCC 25922). Cultures were adjusted to 0.5 Mc Farland standards, i.e. microbial suspension of roughly1.5 × 108 CFU/mL. MHA (Mueller Hinton agar) plates were swabbed with bacterial inoculums of S. aureus and E. coli separately. Antibacterial activity and MIC of compounds were evaluated after 24 hrs at 37ºC by taking absorbance.

 

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:

Reddish yellow-colored compounds were obtained and characterized by photo physics, FT-IR spectroscopy, NMR, HRMS, and elemental analysis. The proposed chemical structure of the complexes as in Scheme 1 was drawn based on spectroscopy and analytical methods. 1H NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Advance III 500 spectrometer with standard pulse programs at 500.10 MHz (1H) in DMSO-D6 at 302°K with TMS as an internal standard. HRMS and FT-IR data supported well with the proposed stoichiometry. The compounds are soluble, only in DMSO <10-3mol/L. The in-vitro biological activities as antioxidant assay, antibacterial activities (E. coli and S. aureus) were performed. The activity of complexes synthesized has been compared with quercetin as reported in earlier studies21.

3.1 Infrared analysis:

The assignments of the wavenumbers of selected hand-picked bands from the FT-IR spectra of quercetin and its metallic element i.e. zinc bipyridal and phenanthroline were tabulated in Table 1. FTIR analysis of the residue obtained after heating of complex 1 and 2 above 8000C showing bands at 478 cm-1 and 475 cm-1 Fig.1 (a) and (b)22. These bands are characteristics of (ZnO) left after heating indicate the presence of Zn in reported complexes (1 and 2).   

 

Fig.1: FT-IR spectrum of residue (ZnO) for complex 1 Fig. (a) and Complex 2 (b).

 


 

Table1. FT-IR spectral (cm-1) assignment of ligand and their complexes.

Complexes Assignment (cm-1)

 

Ʋ-OH

Ʋ-C=O

Ʋ-C-OH

Ʋ-CC+

Ʋ –NC Ʋ-CCH

Ʋ –C-O

Ʋ-CC+ Ʋ-CCH

Ʋ-NCCH+ Ʋ-CCCH

Ʋ-ZnO

Q

3410.46

1666.65

1463.00

1521.1

1263.13

1169.49

-

-

Complex 1

3131.39

1646.43

1426.63

1599.07

1264.14

1168.25

824, 724

478

Complex 2

3363.32

1644.11

1416.64

1599.42

1265.70

1182.56

759, 731

475

 

 


3.2 Photo physical properties:

 

Fig.2 Absorption spectra of ligand and their complexes 10µM solution in DMSO.

 

The UV- visible spectra of quercetin, complex 1 and 2 were determined in the DMSO solution (Fig3) and the spectra of the complex 1 and 2 relevant to the spectra of ligand i.e. quercetin. The absorption band of ligand (378 nm) shifted towards longer wavelength (bathochromic shift) i.e. at 446 and 448 respectively in complex 1 and 2. This band shifting is due to π-π* transition of quercetin and phenanthroline ligands concerning quercetin cinnamoyl band conferring the formation of metal-oxygen bond in ring C and participation of 3-OH group in the chelation 23.

 

3.3 NMR spectroscopy study:

1H NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Advance III 500 spectrometer with standard pulse programs at 500.10 MHz (1H) in DMSO-D6 at 302°K with TMS as an internal standard. The 1H NMR spectra of the compounds in DMSO-d6 show signals for protons of bound ligands and the values of their integrals are consistent with the presence of quercetin, 1, 10- phenanthroline (Phen) and acetate in complex 1 and quercetin, 2,2′-bipyridine (Bpy) and acetate in complex 2 in a 1:1:1 ratio. The resonances belonging to phenanthroline and bipyridal were seen, although they were somewhat broadened. It is shifted slightly in the high field i.e. upfield in case of methylene H3 in both the complexes (Δδ from 1.769 ppm for complex 1 and 1.807- 2.877ppm for complex 2) and low field i.e. downfield upon coordination of ligand to Zn(II) ion. Its resonance is shifted downfield by 6.0 – 6.3ppm for aromatic 4-OH and 7.587- 8.731ppm Phen- 8H, 5H -CH) for complex 1 and 6.107-6.814 ppm for aromatic 4-OH and 7.587- 8.731 ppm Bpy- 8H, 5H -CH) for complex 2. (Fig.3 (a) and (b). The resonances of 1, 10- phenanthroline and 2, 2’-bipyridine are sharp, due to chemical exchange processes or intra - or intermolecular interactions, and therefore cannot be interpreted precisely.


 

Fig. 3 NMR spectra of complex 1 (a) and complex 2 (b)

 


3.4 High-Resolution Mass Spectroscopy Study:

Mass spectral study of the complexes was performed to determine the molecular weight of the complexes. [Fig.4 (a)] HRMS spectra of complex 1 were taken in positive mode the peak at m/z (Calc.) 624.878 and (Exp.) 624.9856 [(Q-H) + Zn (II) (Phen) (AcO) (H2O)] corresponds to the formation of QZnPhenAcOH2O with a stoichiometry of 1:1:1 and [Fig.4 (b)] HRMS spectra of Complex 2 were also taken in positive mode and the peak at m/z (Calc.) 599.858 and (Exp.) 599.0085 [(Q-H) + Zn (II) (BPY) (AcO) (H2O)] corresponds to the formation of QZnBPYAcOH2Owith a stoichiometry of 1:1:1.

 

3.5 Antioxidant activity (DPPH method):

The antioxidant activity of quercetin, complex 1, and 2 were determined by the radical scavenging DPPH method. The percentage of free radical inhibition activity is summarized in Table 2. It is observed that quercetin (IC50 38.1427µg/ml), complex 1(IC50 163.093µg/ml) have significant free radical scavenging activity as compared to complex 2 (IC50 258.683µg/ml). Complex 1 has more potent antioxidant activity as compared to complex 2.

 

 Table2.Antioxidant data of the ligand and their complexes.

 

Complex 1

Q

Complex 2

conc.

% Inhibition

% Inhibition

% Inhibition

20

19.2

30.8

17.233

50

25.5

63.1

23.786

100

39.7

71.4

25.728

200

55.3

77.2

43.042

300

79.5

77.7

54.531

400

80.8

78.3

60.841

500

81.3

78.7

61.327

IC50

163.093 µg/ml

38.142 µg/ml

258.683 µg/ml

 

3.6 In vitro bactericide activity (MIC):

The minimum inhibitory concentration of ligand and its complexes (1,2) were studied on the growth of tested microorganisms (Table 3). The MIC data indicated that synthesized complexes have high potential to restrict the growth of tested microbes as compared to the free ligand.  Complex 1(MIC15.50µg/ml) was found more active as compared to complex 2 (MIC 22.51µg/ml) and ligand (MIC 33.50µg/ml) against E. coli (ATCC 25922). S. aureus (ATCC 29213) was found more susceptible for complex 1 (MIC 7.18µg/ml) as compared to complex 2 (MIC18.62µg/ml) and ligand (MIC 31.25µg/ml). Complex 1 was found more active in both the microbes as compared to complex 2 and quercetin.

 

Table3. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration of the ligand and their complexes

Complexes

S. aureus MIC(µg/ml)

E. coli  MIC(µg/ml)

Q

     31.25

       33.50

complex 1

     7.18

       15.50

complex 2

     18.62

       22.51

 

4. CONCLUSION:

Solid-state synthesis of the complex based on quercetin ligand with Zn (II) acetate incorporated with N ^ N moiety and spectral data (FTIR, UV, NMR, HRMS, and elemental analysis) analysis we may conclude the participation of ring c i.e. carbonyl group of quercetin coordinate through the 5-hydroxyl group with metal [Zn(II)] acetate. Both the complexes are only soluble in DMSO and DMF solvents. Quercetin itself has low bioavailability but when it will coordinate with metal forming complexes its bioavailability increases which may show wide applications in human diseases. From the above conclusion, we may say that complexes (1, 2) safe and showing good antibacterial activity. The study confirms that the newly synthesized compounds are very much active as compared to the quercetin. The complexes may further be studied for detailed biological activity and mechanism of action.

 

5. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS:

The authors are thankful to Dr. S. K. Mishra Department of Pharmaceutics IIT-BHU for his moral support, encouragement.

 

6. CONFLICT OF INTEREST:

All the authors declare that there’s no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

 

7. ABBREVIATIONS:

DPPH (1, 1-Diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl), FT-IR (Fourier Transformation – Infra-Red Spectroscopy), HRMS (High-Resolution Mass Spectroscopy), Zn2+ (Zinc ions), ZnO (Zinc oxide), AcO (Acetate ions), DMSO (Dimethyl sulfoxide)

 

8. REFERENCES:

1.     Byeongno Lee, et al. Solid-state and solvent-free synthesis of azines, pyrazoles, and pyridazinones using solid hydrazine. Tetrahedron Letters, 2013; 54: 1384–1388.

2.     Chattopadhyay G, PS Ray. A facile method for the conversion of semicarbazone/thiosemicarbazones into azines (under microwave irradiation) and oxadiazoles (by grinding). Synth. Commun. 2011; 41: 2607.

3.     Mendiguchia BS, I Aiello, et al. Zn (II) and Cu (II) complexes containing bioactive O, O-chelated ligands: homoleptic and heteroleptic metal-based biomolecules, Dalton Trans. 2015; 44: 9321-9687.

4.     Hirohama T, Kuranuki Y, et al. Complex (II) complexes of 1, 10- phenanthroline derived   ligand studies on DNA binding properties and nuclease activity. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2005; 99: 1205–1219.

5.     Liu HK, Sadler J. Metal complexes as DNA intercalators. Acc. Chem. Res. 2011; 44: 349-359.

6.     Liguori PF, Valentini A. Non-classical anticancer agents: synthesis and biological evaluation of zinc (II) heteroleptic complexes. Dalton Trans. 2010; 39: 4205–4212.

7.     Filho JCC, Sarria ALF, et al. 2014. PLoS ONE 9 e107058.

8.     Pucci D, Crispini A, et al. Improving the bioactivity of Zn (II)-curcumin based complexes. Dalton Trans. De Bartolo. 2013; 42: 9679–9687.

9.     Arivukkarasu Ramasamy, Rajasekaran Aiyalu, Kankaria Vishal, Selvam Madesh. In vitro Anti-Cancer Activity and detection of Quercetin, Apigenin in Methanol extract of Euphorbia nivulia Buch. - Ham. By HPTLC technique. Research J. Pharm. And Tech. 2017; 10(8): 2637- 2640. Doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2017.00468.1.

10.   Tanavade Sangeeta S, Smt. Nilofer Naikwade, Dhanyakumar D. Chougule. In vitro anticancer activity of Ethanolic and Aqueous Extracts of Peristrophe bivalvis Merrill. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2012; 5(10): 1324-1327.

11.   Chakraborty Prithviraj, Kumar Suresh, Dutta Debarupa, Gupta Vikas. Role of Antioxidants in Common Health Diseases. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2009; 2 (2):  238-244.

12.   Soni Anjali, Femida Patel, Sharma Preeti. In-vitro Cytotoxic Activity of Plant Saponin Extracts on Breast Cancer Cell-Line. Res. J. Pharmacognosy and Phytochem. 2017; 9(1): 17-22.

13.   Zouari Ahmed Rachida, Ouahrani M Ridha, Laouini S Eddine, Meneceur Souhaila. Screening of phenolic compounds from Abelmoschus esculentus L extract fruits and In vitro Evaluation of Antioxidant and Antibacterial Activities. Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2017; 10(12): 4371-4376. DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2017.00804.6

14.   Ranjitha Dhevi V. Sundar, Mythili Sathiavelu. A Comparative Study on Phytochemical Screening, Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Capacities of Leaf Extracts from Medicinal plants. Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2019; 12(1): 361-366. DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2019.00066.0

15.   Thennarasu A, Quercetin in Health and Disease. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 6(12): 2013; 1397-1399.

16.   Andelescu AA, Cretu C, et al. New heteroleptic Zn (II) and Cu (II) complexes with quercetin and N^N ligands. Polyhedron. 2018; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poly.2018.03.016.

17.   Kambe T, Tsuji T, et al. The Physiological, Biochemical, and Molecular Roles of Zinc Transporters in Zinc Homeostasis and Metabolism. Physiol. Rev. 2015; 95:749–784.

18.   Pucci D, Crispini A, et al. Improving the bioactivity of Zn (II)-curcumin based complexes. Dalton Trans. 2013; DOI: 10.1039/c3dt50513h.

19.   Brand-Williams W, Cuvelier M.E, et al. Use of a Free Radical Method to Evaluate Antioxidant Activity. Lebensm.-Wiss. U.-Technol. 1995; 28: 25–30.

20.   Balouiri Mounyr, et al. A method for in-vitro evaluating antimicrobial activity: A review. Journal of pharmaceutical analysis. 2006; 6:71-79.

21.   Granato M, Rizzello C, et al. Quercetin induces apoptosis and autophagy in primary effusion lymphoma cells by inhibiting PI3K/AKT/mTOR and STAT3 signaling pathways. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2017; 41: 124-136.

22.   Handorea Kalpana, Bhavsara Sanjay, et al. Novel Green Route of Synthesis of ZnO Nanoparticles by Using Natural Biodegradable Polymer and Its Application as a Catalyst for Oxidation of Aldehydes. Journal of Macromolecular Science. 2014; 51: 941–947.

23.   Kumar Rahul, Bhargava Parag, et al. Synthesis and Characterization of a New Cadmium Complex, Cadmium [(1, 10-phenanthroline) (8-hydroxyquinoline)] Cd (Phen). Procedia Materials Science. 2015; 10: 37 – 43.

 

 

 

 

Received on 24.06.2020           Modified on 17.08.2020

Accepted on 09.09.2020         © RJPT All right reserved

Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2021; 14(7):3585-3590.

DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X.2021.00620